Archive for the ‘General’ Category
I see things like this and it makes me thankful my time in a union was mercifully short. I spent my life in business, including construction, throwing union thugs out for the most part. What interaction I suffered through was almost without exception one screw up after another. Now, on the subject of screw ups I present the SEIU and their baseless, cowardly, dickless propaganda piece…
You figure the link out. Then notice these pussies have the comments shut off. That’s because these boys have no balls. They pick fights with old ladies at Tea Parties. They slug black men trying to make a little money, then laugh at racist slurs. Then they trot out this garbage because they have nothing to say, no facts to fall back on and still lack the manhood to defend their mindless spew even on the internet.
Here’s the deal, Thugs: There is no Nazi connection and anyone who would fall to such depths to try and excuse their little-dicked corruption is too pathetically stupid to take seriously. Why are unions dying? Because of people like you. You are stupid. Not foolish, not ignorant, actually mentally defective. That’s what “union” has come to mean in the minds of people who work for a living.
Now you go even further to make yourselves irrelevant. You once again prove you have been bought and paid for by the Obama socialist machine and you’re not only too stupid to grasp this fact, you’re so pathetically weak-minded you apparently think nobody else will get it, either. It’s simple, thugs, enforcing immigration laws has nothing to do with the Nazi-esque regime you and yours seem so dementedly desperate to service. On your knees.
For those of you with a brain in a union like this the time is coming where your choices are limited. You need to step out and away from these pieces of garbage, do something to remove them from influence or accept that you are no better than them because you keep associating with them. There really are no other choices.
For the rest of you, when this keeps going and you’re cowering in your double-wides like the cowards you are the rest of us, those who actually made it on our own, will be laughing as we walk by, confident in the fact you sure as hell won’t do anything about it. Hell, maybe I can hire an illegal to beat your asses on her way out of the US.
Recently Anwar al-Awlaki put a price on the head of cartoonist Molly Norris. Her crime? To suggest that people expose The Prophet through artistic means. Her catalyst was the censoring of South Park and their portrayal of Mohammed in a bear suit. That’s a not so subtle nod to Pedo Bear for those who’ve never encountered 2channel.

Now it’s not really that important who Norris is, especially since she backed down and recanted her cause. At that point, as someone noted so well, she became just another coward with a fatwah on her head, instead of the person of honor with a fatwah on her head she could have been. No, even al-Awlaki isn’t individually that important here. What he is and how he and his “religion” crush opposition and dissent through intimidation is. That the mere statement they might do something bad is enough to make people from Norris to Comedy Central to movie makers like Roland Emmerich avoid even implying something negative or destructive about Islam or it’s holy places, that’s what is important.
And that can always only lead us one place: Mohammed. The Great Pedophile himself. We see sharks circling the Catholic church over systemic pedophilia and yet fear keeps people silent, too cowed to publicly, loudly, repeatedly call attention to a religion founded on the acts of a pedophile. A violent religion that survives not by prayer and faith but by violence, intimidation, perversion and murder. And it will continue to survive, and continue to do these things, as long as we continue to back down every time a coward like al-Awlaki vomits up his impotence based threats of violence.
I admit I paid little attention to this particular event at first for the simplistic reason I don’t have the talent to participate in Draw Mohammed Day. I can draw very well. Houses, cars, machinery, in inks with little depth or shading. Very technical and rather cold is my version of “art”. Scenery, people, caricatures, no. I just don’t have the ability, or if I do I never developed it. But I suddenly realized something I already knew that applies here: One can draw an image very well with words. One can make a person far more “visible” in text than any picture or caricature ever can.
So, let’s draw Mohammed and with him, his followers.
Pedophile is a serious charge and one not to be thrown around lightly. As such it’s necessary to consider whether Western views color this issue. It’s actually a short consideration. One can make an argument that Pedophilia is determined by the culture surrounding the act. I believe most adults would agree that this argument might hold water when the subject is a teen. Most societies including here in the US had no trouble with people marrying in their early teens. Even “May(more like March)/December” romances were accepted. It was common and necessarily so, and the maturity level needed can be present in the teen years. Especially when lifespans were much shorter than today.
But Mohammed’s victim was six years old when they were betrothed, and a mere 9 when he consummated that marriage. Any culture that can excuse such an act as anything other than a perversion is a culture with fundamental flaws to their core. Any culture that can not merely excuse it but color it righteous and spread the self-serving propaganda of the predator at issue, like a plague on the earth, teeters on the edge of an abyss it deserves to be pushed in to.
Another argument is that The Pedo did not actually have sex with the child at that age. Muslim apologists take a gaggle of out-of-context dates to try and assemble an unsupportable timeline insisting Aisha was 15 at consummation. No evidence or citations for these claims are ever offered. More important, though, are the words of Aisha herself, as well as others in the Muslim tradition. The final answer of the Muslim “faith” is to simply ignore the issue in hope not that it will go away but that they can kill or intimidate everyone into being silent about it.
Upon the head of this “man” whose ego was so weak and desire so perverse he demanded sexual congress with a 9 year old child as his divine right rests the “Religion of Peace”. Think on that the next time someone talks to you about “moderate” Muslims. It’s not just about violence, you know. There’s far more they have to ignore and that makes those mythical moderates way harder to credit.
From this child molesting old man comes the “Peacenik Religion”. A religion that has not merely been perverted by a few violent, greedy men in the way Christianity has been as the apologists claim. No, it’s a religion that is based on the violent conversion of others. Convert or die IS Islam, not a twisting thereof. Mohammed was a raider, a fighter and a general pot-stirring attention seeker. He repackaged an ancient Egyptian pagan worship with bits of Christianity and self-glorification and then beat people stupid until they followed.
Imagine L Ron Hubbard well armed.
Something people should realize here is that “Islam” does not mean “peace”. It means submission to God and, more importantly, by everyone else to Islamic authority. Mohammed knew this and so do most of his followers. All the ones that matter, anyway. Whether the subject is other faiths, peoples or just property like, say, women, submission was the key to Mohammed.
What they do not grasp is separation of Church and State. Regardless of how you feel about the political doctrine the fact is we all see religion and government as being different in the civilized world. This is a Western conceit. It wasn’t something Mohammed ever thought of and even if he had it wouldn’t have fit his grasping for power. For Mohammed the creation of Islam was mostly about the ideal of power, and not the power of God at that.
Initially it was power for him. Submission to him. A typical politician, or bully(perhaps in most cases an oxymoron). Beyond his life, as far as he was able to look at anything beyond his own immediate and usually violently perverse needs, it was about gaining power for his followers and giving eternal life to his name. This agenda defined what we today call Arab culture. That culture is the very definition of Theocracy and for them there can be no other power and thus in the end no other belief. To Islam they are civilization, so when we consider conversion we need to grasp that it’s not just religion they are talking about, but politics and society as well.
Islamic Theocracy. It is the personality of Mohammed writ large. And in full compliment of his ego and goals it seeks to write itself larger. Even now the world domination desired by Islam would be very much like Mohammed’s power over that 9 year old girl he raped so many centuries ago. Perverse, demeaning, destructive. It’s a world of women wrapped in burkas, ideas and opinions crushed and Draconian penalties for unproven “crimes”. A world, in short, where the smallest of men collect and maintain the greatest political power by the most primitive methods of religious thuggery.
So what is the picture drawn? I’d think it should be obvious and I hope those reading will look at Islam from a new perspective. Mohammed was a violent, sick man who through brutality and intimidation gathered a following that, through brutality and intimidation, expanded a cult of personality to include an area and population broad enough to survive his death. During his life he used this power to gratify his base needs just like any other corrupt politician.
After his death his followers used the same tactics to gratify theirs. Control of women. The gaining of wealth. The control of others for no reason other than the perverse pleasure of control. Traits common to all tyrants and perverts, especially those who molest children and abuse women. This is what Islam is really all about. Not God and certainly not peace, but the religion of a political agenda in order to convey power and glory on its leaders. Those leaders being the most violent and dogmatic of the lot.
Today this same violent agenda continues to drive a burgeoning population fanned on by the rhetoric and supported by the intimidation of people like al-Alwaki, determined to reverse their misfortunes of the last few centuries and get what they see as theirs. It’s theirs because they are civilization and, somewhere in the backs of their fuzzy little brains, that is the will of the God they don’t even understand.
To intimidate you, silence those who speak out, murder women and children, this is their right as long as it furthers their power. So they believe and so their Pervert, erm, Prophet, told them. They will continue to succeed not only as long as we make excuses for them but especially as long as we back down in fear. It will end when we finally do speak up with the truth of what Mohammed really looks like and refuse to be bullied into submission by men who, like Mohammed, have no balls and less brains.
Today in a 5/4 ruling with the usual suspects opposing freedom the SCOTUS incorporated the 2nd Amendment under the 14th, striking down Chicago’s wildly insane gun ban and remanding it back to the lower court for final action. Finally the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, set second only to the Right of Free Speech by the Founders, has been given full legal recognition as an INDIVIDUAL Right.
Of course the the VPC could not waste a moment in lying about the decision and it’s results. Once again we get to hear the tired lament of how there will now be blood in the streets. We heard it about Concealed Carry. We heard it about Vermont Style carry. We heard it about the end of the Klinton Ugly Gun Ban. So far the entire nation is still waiting.
For those truly interested the actual decision is available here. Be warned, it’s a long read.
In related news, King Daley assembled a group of fellow Mindless Mayors with the intent(knowing he was going to lose) of appealing this to, are you ready for it, the World Court! When asked if he thought this could possibly serve any purpose(except to waste even more millions of his subjects dollars) he replied “That’s why we have about 12 million lawyers. You never know till you try”.
Well, Little Dick Daley, you and your ilk have been trying these anti-freedom schemes for decades and it seems everyone but you knows the outcome by now: Epic failure. Gun control, and Democrat rule, don’t work. If you really don’t get that yet this ruling is one more indicator you’re going to be taught the lesson come this November.
This show is like a no lose scenario for me. Wacky environuts do battle with whale-killing Japanese…well…Japanese… No matter who dies it’s a positive for us and the whales! And they are spending millions of the ill-gotten gains of people like Bob Barker to annoy people spending millions of ill-gotten Japanese government gains to kill something for no reason! There is just no downside to this. You can root for whoever is winning at the moment and never feel like a hypocrite!
I’m hoping, for the eventual series finale, we get to watch as the entire Sea Shepherd fleet and the Jap whaling fleet all engage in a massive mid-ocean collision where everyone dies and the closing shot fades to black on whales and dolphins feeding on the remains. In the reunion show 10 years later we can send down a submersible to view the life that has taken over the wreckage. Mike Rowe can narrate…
OK, what actually got me started on this was the only negative so far in all this potential human carnage. This:

Which may be the coolest boat in the world, was repainted to this…

which is even cooler, until it wound up like this…

Thus proving once again that only lefties can manage to get a 70 foot speed boat cut in half by several hundred feet of sluggish Japanese enemy in open ocean.
Just ask JFK…
Worth noting for anyone voting in the Repub primary May 4th, there are three names on the ballot worth mentioning and all are pro-2nd Amendment. John Hostettler, Marlin Stutzman and Dan Coats. In fact even the lone Democrat, Brad Ellsworth(less) is pro-gun. Ellsworth is just a DINO and his only harm would be in giving the left another head to count in the Senate. They all have perfect pro-gun voting records.
All but one.
Dan Coats in 1993 voted for Clinton’s “Assault Weapons Ban” and the “Brady Bill”. Good ol’ “Gonna retire in North Carolina Dan” is the hand picked DC RNC candidate, too. Those two things should be all the reason needed to vote for Hostettler or Stutzman. Personally I’ll vote for John, and I’ll take Coats over Ellsworth if it comes to that…but it really doesn’t have to. Any of the three Repubs can beat L’il Bradley so why not pick one of the better ones… Indiana will be sending a Repub to the Senate this November so do it right.
I have endorsed this message. No leftists were harmed in its making.
Despite lots of bluff and bluster The One is getting his agenda in place, one step at a time. The highest profile item is ObamaScam, the healthcare debacle. No denying this is the crown jewel and so it has to get the most focus, even here. Obama and his cronies bullied and blackmailed and bribed his fellow Socialist Dems in a brazen way not seen before. In the process they sacrificed the party majority…assuming that even matters now. There’s just no ignoring this sort of arrogance.
So, what did we get and how? What we did not get is healthcare for all those uninsured. As Hillary noted in the election, this scheme was never designed to cover everyone. It wasn’t what Obama claimed to want and it wasn’t what his fellow lefties claimed to want and it sure as hell was not what the US Citizenry wanted. But here it is in all it’s Medicare cutting, tax hiking glory. For those interested here’s the reconciliation bill. Enjoy the read, and have a handy place to vomit, too.
So who got bought in all this? Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV) voted for the scam on the agreement DoJ would drop their investigation of his land scam deals. Landrieu (D-LA) raked in around 300 million for her state thx to that slime ball Harry Reid. That complete fool Stupak D-MI) voted for the scheme after Obastard gave him a meaningless and non-binding promise of an EO against fed funding of abortion. Stupak then promptly announced his “retirement” when it became clear his political career was over as a result. one wonders what payback the Regime has given him for falling on his sword. And, of course, then there is the “Cornhusker Kickback”. Ben Nelson(D-NE) gets a freebie for his entire state in exchange for his betrayal of the Constitution.
Then there’s the blatant “We don’t give a shit brigade” As represented by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.): “there ain’t no rules here, we’re trying to accomplish something. . . All this talk about rules. . . When the deal goes down . . . we make ‘em up as we go along.” Or how about Rep Hare (D-IL), who went on video openly stating he doesn’t care about the constitution. Do it for the CHILLUNS, fer the luv of GOD! And yet these people wonder why their approval is so low, and insist everyone else is “extremist” in stating the clear fact that, come November, the Dems will pay for this Obortion.
But there’s more. Back on the table is Amnesty. What’s the purpose? To weigh elections with bought votes to help save the Dems from the consequences of their actions. Nevermind the lame claims that the illegals don’t count for enough numbers. If you figure the real number of illegals, around 13 million, and then you spread them out appropriately across the various states and districts they damn sure will be effective in saving the asses of any number of socialist bastards. How do you build a totalitarian regime? Ensure you stay in power and this is one way.
Then there is Cap & Tax. Pass this and run up energy costs for every Citizen until they can barely afford their utilities. Then start with the effort to keep people handily in place, as discussed here(with lots of links)
http://www.homesteadingtexas.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=23464
and the actual legislation
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h2454pcs.txt.pdf .
Planned on selling that house, eh? Not under Obamanation.
And there’s plenty more to discuss, from transportation to tax hikes to the end of Social (in)Security. We’ll cover those over the next few days, along with Obastard’s Jewish insults and open advertising for terrorists to come bomb us since we won’t retaliate. For now, though, digest some of the above and try to keep your gorge from rising.
I was driving to the doctor this AM and heard some Brit on the news talking about how wonderful it was that Obastard and his familiar, erm, wife, had put in all the effort, or sacrifice to use her word, for the Olympic effort and how everyone, especially the African nation representatives, just loved him/them(in spite of everything European officials have been saying about him lately)…
On the way home the first news item out of the block was that Chicago had been eliminated in the first round of voting. While I know it’s probably petty I just could not help but smile. Not merely at the smack down for The One, but at the thought of the absolute tantrum he’s certainly throwing on AF1. I do feel for all the poor people trapped on that Boeing with him, though.
So, I guess the next questions are, how will they blame this on Bush(I have an answer for that), what will be The One’s excuse and how much screeching is going to come from MayorDaleyville? The first, as I note, seems obvious; the left will cry that Bush so poisoned world opinion against the US that even the mighty charm of The One, and the “sacrifice” of his wife could not overcome it. And, of course, his mindless minions will believe every absurd word of it..
How The Ego himself will Spin it is a little harder to tell. If he’s angry enough he may well use the leftist talking point and blame it on bush. Considering the latest unemployment figures he’s really running out of any other options on any issue. It’s all gotta be Bush because the only alternative at this late date is The One ain’t all he was cracked up to be. While the rest of the world may well be coming to realize that the odds of Obama himself ever questioning his own ego are below any ability to measure.
Lastly, what of Chicago? What of the corrupt politicians that comprise every single tax-stealing government thug in a 100 mile area? What of all the Obama cronies who he certainly promised the chance to steal from an Olympic project? All those union thugs who won’t get those imaginary and transient “48,000 jobs” and all those fat cats who won’t get to sell their run down properties for exorbitant sums? And that isn’t even considering all the money wasted to maintain the unwanted and unneeded infrastructure after the Olympics toddle away…
Well after they finish chewing off parts of their own extremities in fits of petulant impotency you can bet they won’t blame Obastard. They helped put his sorry ass in power and if he owed them before he surely owes them now after a failure like this. Problem is, they can’t publicly call him on the carpet for it because them they can’t try to recoup their losses at a later date. So as with all the rest of the minions they’ll blame Bush, or the world in general, or racist conservatives.
In the meantime, while I really just can’t stop laughing the more I think about this, you can bet the One will be more desperate than ever to ram something through as a sop to his handlers. So if you thought you’d seen the last of healthcare and federal sales taxes guess again. the One is further in debt now than he ever has been…though not nearly so far as he’s put the rest of us.
There is just nothing at all that i can possibly add to this piece. Read it…and weep.
October 01, 2009
Sympathy for the Devil
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/sympathy_for_the_devil.html
I’ve decided to embrace the label. Why, you ask? Because as someone on the radio is heard to say, “words mean things”. He’s correct so far as he goes. What he fails to acknowledge is that in the modern world of leftism the things words mean are dependent on the desires and agenda of the word user. What was once a descriptive term used to denote an ugly form of humanity can suddenly become a tool to silence those who don’t think like you.
Such is the case with “racist”. Might as well embrace it. The word once meant someone who bases their opinion of another on the color of their skin. Now, according to the Obamabots, it means anyone who opposes Obastard. So based on the NewSpeak definition I am a racist! Thank you and have a nice day…
Such is the style of the tolerant left. It’s the final expression of what we used to call the race card but must now call the race deck. There’s just too much use of it to refer to the device in a singular fashion any more. And therein we arrive at the problem, the issue of meaning and acceptance, even embracement, by those tarred and feathered with it.
I disagree with Obama’s policies. I do not buy his Euro-leftist medical scheme or his billions in bailouts. I do not accept that government taking over major public corporations to “save” them is the logical, let alone Constitutional, thing to do. I can’t be quiet about the massive debt he is creating with the full and willing participation of a Democrat CONgress. I hope he fails and I am smart enough to realize and understand that just because HE fails doesn’t mean the United States fails. I am not stupid enough to think the events at Townhall meetings are anything but what they are, grasroots anger at bloated government expansion. Nor am I dumb enough to not recognize the Chicago style union thuggery for exactly what it is.
In short, I oppose Obama and as such, according to the tolerant left, I am a racist. Because, you see, none of the above matters. Policy and principle and the Rule of Law and faith in the Constitution and Bill of Rights are not legitimate reasons to speak up. The only reason, according to an increasingly shrill left, to speak against The One is because of the color of his skin. They chant this, not because they believe it but because people have for so long been conditioned to recoil from the racist label that they know they can silence their rational opposition without engaging in debate. Debate they can no t win.
This is the verbal and written equivalent of those SEIU thugs at the Townhall meetings. And it will work as it always has in the past…unless we choose to refuse to accept their redefinitions. Embrace the term while laughing at the stupidity and arrogance of those who sling it about. Take away its mystery and power by greeting it with a smile and a nod.
“Yes, I oppose Obama and his unconstitutional policies and if you call that racism then by all means, call me a racist!”
From here on I do so. I encourage everyone at every Townhall and every public encounter and private discussion to accept the label with pride. If this be their new meaning then so be it. A racist opposes Obama, so they say. I do, so I am and that is something to be proud of and if that bothers them they have only two choices, shut up about it and find a new label or admit to their own disingenius use of a sad shade of NewSpeak.
That and they need to find a new word to describe people like Jesse Jackson and Robert Byrd, though somehow I think the irony may be lost on them. Most everything else seems to be these days…
We’ve heard for decades now about the need to not appear too extreme in either direction lest we offend the “moderates”. In all that time we keep hearing how these people are the ones that decide elections and how the “true believers”, the “extremists”, can’t put a national candidate into office on their own. I have come to a conclusion regarding these claims.
It’s bullcrap foisted upon us by those on the extreme of one side or the other, usually the left, to protect their own pet issues and their own hardcore.
In these United States there are about 210 million potential voters over the age of 18. Of those the highest registration we have ever seen is 80%, or 184 million in 2008. Of that number about 124 million actually voted. About 55% of everyone eligible to vote. 45% of those who could stayed home. 20% didn’t even care enough to register in the highest registered election in 4 decades or more.
There are your fence sitters. There are your moderates. That block of people the talking heads and self-styled sooth-sayers tell us we must not offend lest we scare them off. Here’s a clue: They are never around to scare off in the first place. They…don’t…matter. By definition the “moderates” don’t care enough or know enough, or care to know enough, to be bothered by politics.
Those who care enough to actually cast their ballots ARE the extremists. They are getting out, rain or shine or snow to voice their opinion because one or two major issues drive them forth. They care and they are going to make damn sure to show it. Of those there’s a little less than 30% of the population on the conservative side of the aisle and a little less than 30% on the left and within those numbers are a few who can be swayed one way or the other by a major issue. Abortion, guns, taxes, war. The question is not whether we should be worrying about offending the non-existent fence-sitters…
It’s about which specific issues we can harvest the most extremists from the other side with. And how to stop them from harvesting from our side with their own hardline rhetoric. It’s about how we can motivate the largest percentage of those on our side, the disgusted ones who view the appeasement mentality directed at these fictional moderates with disgust to vote and bring along their friends.
The Republican Party needs to come down hard on its fundamental Christian values. It needs to come down solidly on it’s fundamental Constititonalist issues. It needs to cement its base while offering a clear alternative for those Dems who value the Second Amendment, the military and/or the Bill of Rights as a whole. If that offends the rest of the Democrat Party, so be it. If it offends the 45% of the voting age population who stay home anyway, the real moderates, who cares? They don’t matter.
All that matters are we “extremists”. the people who care enough to vote. Our job is to keep our own happy while offering theirs something worth changing sides for over one single, important, extremist, issue.
There’s nothing in the middle of the political road except yellow lines, dead possums and people who don’t vote. When the Repubs figure that out they, we, will win solidly. The Dems are already well on their way to grasping this reality, hence their “divisive” politcs. We can no longer afford to “moderate” our own for fictional votes and their fatal results.