Archive for the ‘Conklin’ Category

I see things like this and it makes me thankful my time in a union was mercifully short.  I spent my life in business, including construction, throwing union thugs out for the most part.  What interaction I suffered through was almost without exception one screw up after another.  Now, on the subject of screw ups I present the SEIU and their baseless, cowardly, dickless propaganda piece…

You figure the link out.  Then notice these pussies have the comments shut off.  That’s because these boys have no balls.  They pick fights with old ladies at Tea Parties.  They slug black men trying to make a little money, then laugh at racist slurs.  Then they trot out this garbage because they have nothing to say, no facts to fall back on and still lack the manhood to defend their mindless spew even on the internet.

Here’s the deal, Thugs:  There is no Nazi connection and anyone who would fall to such depths to try and excuse their little-dicked corruption is too pathetically stupid to take seriously.  Why are unions dying?  Because of people like you.  You are stupid.  Not foolish, not ignorant, actually mentally defective.  That’s what “union” has come to mean in the minds of people who work for a living.

Now you go even further to make yourselves irrelevant.  You once again prove you have been bought and paid for by the Obama socialist machine and you’re not only too stupid to grasp this fact, you’re so pathetically weak-minded you apparently think nobody else will get it, either.  It’s simple, thugs, enforcing immigration laws has nothing to do with the Nazi-esque regime you and yours seem so dementedly desperate to service.  On your knees.

For those of you with a brain in a union like this the time is coming where your choices are limited.  You need to step out and away from these pieces of garbage, do something to remove them from influence or accept that you are no better than them because you keep associating with them.  There really are no other choices.

For the rest of you, when this keeps going and you’re cowering in your double-wides like the cowards you are the rest of us, those who actually made it on our own, will be laughing as we walk by, confident in the fact you sure as hell won’t do anything about it.  Hell, maybe I can hire an illegal to beat your asses on her way out of the US.

Let’s just start by defining some simple parameters regarding the immigration issue in general and SB1070 in particular.  First off are some questions: Are all Hispanics bigots in the opinion of the left?  Second, are all Hispanics felons?  Last, does SB1070 do anything new?

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that even the lefty answers are predictable here; No, no, and yes.  See, that poses a problem for the left in this “argument”.   It effectively means there is no argument.  What passes for debate is nothing more or less than race baiting and misrepresentation.

The reason for the questions is to establish exactly what we are talking about. First, we are not talking about immigrants. We are not talking about the opinion of only whites. We are talking about the prevailing opinion(yes, the majority, whether you like that or not) of US Citizens regarding illegal and eventually felonious invaders.   The subject is US Citizens of all races regarding Illegal aliens of all races.

So the race card and bigot label no longer fly. They don’t fly with me and they don’t fly with ever more people daily. We’re just not buying it anymore just as the Race Card has also been maxed out.  You can toss them around but the only thing it gets you is dismissal. Automatic and off the cuff dismissal by everyone who isn’t playing the same cards for the same reasons.  That would be most of the nation, by the way.

Nobody is interested in having that debate any longer because it is nothing but a manufactured distraction from the issue. And a painfully transparent one at that.  US Citizens, their color and creed not at issue except among those with an agenda, want these people to obey the laws or reap the consequences for not doing so. Those who have not obeyed the law need to go, and a state law modeled on federal law is one way to do it.

The only reason to oppose it is either you’ve got a Libertarian Open Borders slant to you, which is naive on so many levels, or you have a Dem Partisan hope of padding elections with a theoretically built in voter base. One that, despite a few claims to the contrary, is large enough to influence any race in the western half of the US.  While the former might have some logic behind it if not for the massive Welfare State that draws in these Illegals, the latter is partisan thuggery at, almost, its lowest.

Otherwise? They are criminals and the US has immigration laws. Not even particularly onerous ones at that, which Citizens want enforced. Especially those Citizens of various races including Hispanic who got here by following those rules.  It’s not complex and it doesn’t involve race.  If it temporarily produces an economic issue in some areas, of which there is nothing but noisy anecdotal evidence from at least nominally pro-illegal sources, then that’s the price to be paid for failing to handle the problem for decades.

No rational person ever expected it would be fixed over night and without hardship somewhere to somebody. No problem this large and this old can be, but that is not a reason to not do it. There is no reason to not do it, except the foolish or the partisan one. Bigotry exists only in the minds of those guilty of one or the other.

Finally there is the law itself.  It’s linked above but I’ll link SB1070 one more time.  Leftists seem to have a problem with reading legislation before they comment, or vote, on it.  What IS this law?  It’s federal law given to a state by the state because of the miserable failure of the feds to enforce their law.  There’s nothing new in it and the only thing new likely to come from it is enforcement of immigration law.  In other words, Illegal Aliens go to jail.  What a concept!

So what’s it not going to do?  It’s not going to create a “your papers please” nation.  It’s not going to target Canadians or create a police state(much as that would well serve the purposes of the Obastard Regime).  Cops aren’t going to be pulling over cars for random stops because you’re eating a burrito.  No unmarked units will be sitting up the block from Taco Bell like a bar on a Friday night, or the Chinese restaurant or NAACP local office, either(though considering the Panthers and the recent Tea Party-bashing maybe the latter needs it).

Despite the fear mongering of the left none of these things are going to happen.  It’s not even going to get all the illegal aliens, either arrested or even driven out.  But it is a tool to get, and keep, some of the more egregious offenders when they get pulled over and are drunk, unlicensed, uninsured, or caught after a robbery…or murder.  Get them, keep them and prosecute them as opposed to the revolving door policy in place right now under federal “control”.

So where does this leave the left?  It’s not about race and it’s not about making a police state and the only people who don’t support it are those who stand to lose something if it passes.  Like, say, their free economic or political ride.  In light of this it’s no wonder the left is screeching so shrilly.  For the Citizens of the United States there simply is no downside and that doesn’t fit with current Democrat Party policy.

Recently Anwar al-Awlaki put a price on the head of cartoonist Molly Norris.  Her crime?  To suggest that people expose The Prophet through artistic means.  Her catalyst was the censoring of South Park and their portrayal of  Mohammed in a bear suit.  That’s a not so subtle nod to Pedo Bear for those who’ve never encountered 2channel.

Now it’s not really that important who Norris is, especially since she backed down and recanted her cause.  At that point, as someone noted so well, she became just another coward with a fatwah on her head, instead of the person of honor with a fatwah on her head she could have been.  No, even al-Awlaki isn’t individually that important here.   What he is and how he and his “religion” crush opposition and dissent through intimidation is.  That the mere statement they might do something bad is enough to make people from Norris to Comedy Central to movie makers like Roland Emmerich avoid even implying something negative or destructive about Islam or it’s holy places, that’s what is important.

And that can always only lead us one place:  Mohammed.  The Great Pedophile himself.  We see sharks circling the Catholic church over systemic pedophilia and yet fear keeps people silent, too cowed to publicly, loudly, repeatedly call attention to a religion founded on the acts of a pedophile.  A violent religion that survives not by prayer and faith but by violence, intimidation, perversion and murder.  And it will continue to survive, and continue to do these things, as long as we continue to back down every time a coward like al-Awlaki vomits up his impotence based threats of violence.

I admit I paid little attention to this particular event at first for the simplistic reason I don’t have the talent to participate in Draw Mohammed Day.  I  can draw very well.  Houses, cars, machinery, in inks with little depth or shading.  Very technical and rather cold is my version of “art”.  Scenery, people, caricatures, no.  I just don’t have the ability, or if I do I never developed it.  But I suddenly realized something I already knew that applies here:  One can draw an image very well with words.  One can make a person far more “visible” in text than any picture or caricature ever can.

So, let’s draw Mohammed and with him, his followers.

Pedophile is a serious charge and one not to be thrown around lightly.   As such it’s necessary to consider whether Western views color this issue.  It’s actually a short consideration.   One can make an argument that Pedophilia is determined by the culture surrounding the act.   I believe most adults would agree that this argument might hold water when the subject is a teen.   Most societies including here in the US had no trouble with people marrying in their early teens.  Even “May(more like March)/December” romances were accepted.   It was common and necessarily so, and the maturity level needed can be present in the teen years.  Especially when lifespans were much shorter than today.

But Mohammed’s victim was six years old when they were betrothed, and a mere 9 when he consummated that marriage.  Any culture that can excuse such an act as anything other than a perversion is a culture with fundamental flaws to their core.  Any culture that can not merely excuse it but color it righteous and spread the self-serving propaganda of the predator at issue, like a plague on the earth, teeters on the edge of an abyss it deserves to be pushed in to.

Another argument is that The Pedo did not actually have sex with the child at that age.  Muslim apologists take a gaggle of out-of-context dates to try and assemble an unsupportable timeline insisting Aisha was 15 at consummation.   No evidence or citations for these claims are ever offered.  More important, though, are the words of Aisha herself, as well as others in the Muslim tradition.  The final answer of the Muslim “faith” is to simply ignore the issue in hope not that it will go away but that they can kill or intimidate everyone into being silent about it.

Upon the head of this “man” whose ego was so weak and desire so perverse he demanded sexual congress with a 9 year old child as his divine right rests the “Religion of Peace”.  Think on that the next time someone talks to you about “moderate” Muslims.  It’s not just about violence, you know.  There’s far more they have to ignore and that makes those mythical moderates way harder to credit.

From this child molesting old man comes the “Peacenik Religion”.  A religion that has not merely been perverted by a few violent, greedy men in the way Christianity has been  as the apologists claim.  No, it’s a religion that is based on the violent conversion of others.  Convert or die IS Islam, not a twisting thereof.  Mohammed was a raider, a fighter and a general pot-stirring attention seeker.  He repackaged an ancient Egyptian pagan worship with bits of Christianity and self-glorification and then beat people stupid until they followed.

Imagine L Ron Hubbard well armed.

Something people should realize here is that “Islam” does not mean “peace”.  It means submission to God and, more importantly, by everyone else to Islamic authority.  Mohammed knew this and so do most of his followers.  All the ones that matter, anyway.  Whether the subject is other faiths, peoples or just property like, say, women, submission was the key to Mohammed.

What they do not grasp is separation of Church and State.  Regardless of how you feel about the political doctrine the fact is we all see religion and government as being different in the civilized world.  This is a Western conceit.   It wasn’t something Mohammed ever thought of  and even if he had it wouldn’t have fit his grasping for power.  For Mohammed the creation of Islam was mostly about the ideal of power, and not the power of God at that.

Initially it was power for him.  Submission to him.  A typical politician, or bully(perhaps in most cases an oxymoron).   Beyond his life, as far as he was able to look at anything beyond his own immediate and usually violently perverse needs, it was about gaining power for his followers and giving eternal life to his name.  This agenda defined what we today call Arab culture.  That culture is the very definition of Theocracy and for them there can be no other power and thus in the end no other belief.   To Islam they are civilization, so when we consider conversion we need to grasp that it’s not just religion they are talking about, but politics and society as well.

Islamic Theocracy.  It is the personality of Mohammed writ large.  And in full compliment of his ego and goals it seeks to write itself larger.   Even now the world domination desired by Islam would be very much like Mohammed’s power over that 9 year old girl he raped so many centuries ago.  Perverse, demeaning, destructive.  It’s a world of women wrapped in burkas, ideas and opinions crushed and Draconian penalties for unproven “crimes”.  A world, in short, where the smallest of men collect and maintain the greatest political power by the most primitive methods of religious thuggery.

So what is the picture drawn?  I’d think it should be obvious and I hope those reading will look at Islam from a new perspective.  Mohammed was a violent, sick man who through brutality and intimidation gathered a following that, through brutality and intimidation, expanded a cult of personality to include an area and population broad enough to survive his death.  During his life he used this power to gratify his base needs just like any other corrupt politician.

After his death his followers used the same tactics to gratify theirs.  Control of women.  The gaining of wealth.  The control of  others for no reason other than the perverse pleasure of control.  Traits common to all tyrants and perverts, especially those who molest children and abuse women.  This is what Islam is really all about.  Not God and certainly not peace, but the religion of a political agenda in order to convey power and glory on its leaders.  Those leaders being the most violent and dogmatic of the lot.

Today this same violent agenda continues to drive a burgeoning population fanned on by the rhetoric and supported by the intimidation of people like al-Alwaki, determined to reverse their misfortunes of the last few centuries and get what they see as theirs.  It’s theirs because they are civilization and, somewhere in the backs of their fuzzy little brains, that is the will of the God they don’t even understand.

To intimidate you, silence those who speak out, murder women and children, this is their right as long as it furthers their power.  So they believe and so their Pervert, erm, Prophet, told them.  They will continue to succeed not only as long as we make excuses for them but especially as long as we back down in fear.  It will end when we finally do speak up with the truth of what Mohammed really looks like and refuse to be bullied into submission by men who, like Mohammed, have no balls and less brains.

Today in a 5/4 ruling with the usual suspects opposing freedom the SCOTUS incorporated the 2nd Amendment under the 14th, striking down Chicago’s wildly insane gun ban and remanding it back to the lower court for final action.  Finally the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, set second only to the Right of Free Speech by the Founders, has been given full legal recognition as an INDIVIDUAL Right.

Of course the the VPC could not waste a moment in lying about the decision and it’s results.  Once again we get to hear the tired lament of how there will now be blood in the streets.  We heard it about Concealed Carry.  We heard it about Vermont Style carry.  We heard it about the end of the Klinton Ugly Gun Ban.  So far the entire nation is still waiting.

For those truly interested the actual decision is available here.  Be warned, it’s a long read.

In related news, King Daley assembled a group of fellow Mindless Mayors with the intent(knowing he was going to lose) of appealing this to, are you ready for it, the World Court!  When asked if he thought this could possibly serve any purpose(except to waste even more millions of his subjects dollars) he replied “That’s why we have about 12 million lawyers.  You never know till you try”.

Well, Little Dick Daley, you and your ilk have been trying these anti-freedom schemes for decades and it seems everyone but you knows the outcome by now:  Epic failure.  Gun control, and Democrat rule, don’t work.   If you really don’t get that yet this ruling is one more indicator you’re going to be taught the lesson come this November.

I believe there are going to have to be a series of “Stuck on Stupid” posts here over the next few days.  That would be because this nation seems to increasingly be infested with people who define that term for daily observation.  Today’s example?  Bloomington, Indiana.

You have to understand that for those of us living in nearby communities Bloomington has long been a source of…humor, to put it kindly.  Smack in the middle of a rational and conservative area sits this college town whose “leadership” fancies itself the Berkley of the Midwest.   We’ve had tree sitters and anti-2nd Amendment nuts and every stripe of econut up there for years.   And, of course, it was once the home of that creature Kinsey.

But now, in a paroxysm of grandiose pretension the city council of this small midwestern burg has sent a missive to Arizona telling them said burg will no longer purchase from or do business with Arizona/Arizona based companies.  In a move apparently conceived for self-immolation these same under-informed and over-stuffed city officials are considering ways to break contracts with any Arizona business they are currently tied to.  One wonders if maybe these people, starting with Mayor Kruzman, wouldn’t be better off to simply have a tax dollar bonfire as opposed to wasting it on the lawsuits they’ll lose over such an act of stupidity.

What’s it all about?  Immigration, of course.  Specifically the Arizona law that does nothing but follow existing federal law…better than the Feds do.

After this debacle, and in the face of common sense appeals from state senators, perhaps more importantly their own local Chamber of Commerce has weighed in.  The Chamber has been informed by masses of the public, including those of us outside the burg, that as long as this stupidity is in force our dollars will be going elsewhere.  The Chamber has wisely told these elected(and likely soon unelected) flunkies to back off their agenda.

If nothing else they won’t be able to have as big a bonfire when businesses in Bloomington, not Arizona, start to fold from this lefty neural twitch(commonly referred to as a knee-jerk reaction).

Kruzman’s reply?  That while he never actually thought such an action could have an effect(imagine that) it’s necessary to oppose such a racist action(translation:  Grandstand to the koolaid left and display their total ignorance to everyone else).  Efforts to inform these people what the Arizona law is have, typically, fallen on deaf ears.  Arguably yet another attempt at deliberately going down in political flames.

What does it take to make stupid people go away.  Not fix them.  As the saying goes, you can’t fix stupid.  How about just getting them to shut up?  How about getting them to realize if they think the Arizona law has anything to do with racism, if anyone thinks immigration enforcement in general has anything to do with racism, they are stupid and need to shut up?  I don’t demand they stop being stupid, just don’t insist the rational part of the nation listen to your stupidity spewed through the megaphones of race cards and boycotts.   We’re sick of hearing it.

Frankly I am missing the era of walled cities more every day.  We could then just block up the gates of Bloomington, cut the wires and let them babble to themselves like the lunatics they are.

This show is like a no lose scenario for me.  Wacky environuts do battle with whale-killing Japanese…well…Japanese…  No matter who dies it’s a positive for us and the whales!  And they are spending millions of the ill-gotten gains of people like Bob Barker to annoy people spending millions of ill-gotten Japanese government gains to kill something for no reason!  There is just no downside to this.  You can root for whoever is winning at the moment and never feel like a hypocrite!

I’m hoping, for the eventual series finale, we get to watch as the entire Sea Shepherd fleet and the Jap whaling fleet all engage in a massive mid-ocean collision where everyone dies and the closing shot fades to black on whales and dolphins feeding on the remains.  In the reunion show 10 years later we can send down a submersible to view the life that has taken over the wreckage.  Mike Rowe can narrate…

OK, what actually got me started on this was the only negative so far in all this potential human carnage.  This:

Which may be the coolest boat in the world, was repainted to this…

which is even cooler, until it wound up like this…

Thus proving once again that only lefties can manage to get a 70 foot speed boat cut in half by several hundred feet of sluggish Japanese enemy in open ocean.

Just ask JFK…

Rumor has it that Joe “Gaffe Master” Biden was feeling the heat as The One introduced his new choice for VP in the next election.

Actually this little critter, a true “DC Insider”, slithered from some bushes and made a dash for another set of bushes, leaving fearless leader clearly upstaged and providing more fodder for jokes that cut closer to the quick than much in recent memory.  But no, there is no God, eh?  And He doesn’t have a sense of irony, either…

OTOH, it might explain Mrs The One’s unusually happy look as posted yesterday…

EDIT:  Someone commented to me today that it appears to be a shrew, and isn’t it even more Ironic that Mrs Obastard happens to be of the same genus?

I’d love to personally be the one that made her give such a look.  I’d laugh myself outta breath…

It’s always a white guy.  Whenever something blows up, or tries to blow up, it’s a white guy first.  And he’s angry about ObamaCare.  He’s a gun owner and a conservative Christian, too.  And he’ll continue to be an angry, armed, fundy white guy until the authorities catch a Pakistani Muslime trying to get out of the country and can’t deny it any longer.  That’s the political reality of the Obastard Regime and the left in general.  Think back to Phil Donahue and the Beltway Sniper and his assurance to us all that “it’s a white guy”.  Phil was wrong, as usual, but he was still prescient.

Move forward in time and we get the latest not-quite-smart-enough-to-make-it-go-boom would-be terrorist, the Times Square Bomber.  According to the officials of fedgov we knew, almost immediately, that this was no Muzzie.  No act of terrorism here folks.  Nothing to see.  Just some angry white guy with an Evil SUV.  The Powers That Be parroted that line of Obama-serving crap until the moment they could no longer hide the fact it was a Pakistani with a Koran shaped chip on his narrow little shoulder.  I’d suggest that if they could find a way to continue misrepresenting the reality they would do so even now.

Hell, let’s be honest…they’d lie.

Speaking of lying, that brings up Mayor Bloomberg.  Those two things just naturally go together, after all.   Talking to the Obastard/lefty mouthpiece Katie Couric, Bloomberg, famous for getting his grubby paws slapped down for illegal efforts at interfering with the 2nd Amendment rights of Citizens smart enough to not live in New Yawk, went right to it.  Encouraged by l’il Catie he said

If I had to guess — 25 cents — this would be exactly that, somebody… home-grown, maybe a mentally deranged person or somebody with a political agenda that doesn’t like the health care bill or something. It could be anything.

I suppose the interesting question here, really, is why?  Do people like this really hate their own nation, and perhaps themselves, this much?  For Obastard it’s easy to understand:  He’s a foreign-born Muslim.  But for people like Bloominidiot it almost has to be self-loathing.  Hatred of pretty much everything they are supposed to protect as well.  Merely following the socialist agenda doesn’t seem to be enough to explain this need for it to always be a white guy, or the fixation on race in general.  The only advantages to protecting the Muslimes and their camel-humping sun- god-worshiping pedophile, erm, Prophet are just too vague to justify it.  The answer may fit the agenda but it simply can’t be defined by it.

People like Bloomberg and the rest of the Apologists may claim some label of “tolerance” and there’s always the plus of bashing the opposition we know they hate, us, but it’s just not enough.  They have to hate themselves even more than they hate the US and the Constitution.  And to find that sort of insanity you’ll always be looking for a white guy.

Worth noting for anyone voting in the Repub primary May 4th, there are three names on the ballot worth mentioning and all are pro-2nd Amendment. John Hostettler, Marlin Stutzman and Dan Coats. In fact even the lone Democrat, Brad Ellsworth(less) is pro-gun. Ellsworth is just a DINO and his only harm would be in giving the left another head to count in the Senate. They all have perfect pro-gun voting records.

All but one.

Dan Coats in 1993 voted for Clinton’s “Assault Weapons Ban” and the “Brady Bill”. Good ol’ “Gonna retire in North Carolina Dan” is the hand picked DC RNC candidate, too. Those two things should be all the reason needed to vote for Hostettler or Stutzman. Personally I’ll vote for John, and I’ll take Coats over Ellsworth if it comes to that…but it really doesn’t have to. Any of the three Repubs can beat L’il Bradley so why not pick one of the better ones… Indiana will be sending a Repub to the Senate this November so do it right.

I have endorsed this message. No leftists were harmed in its making.